NY Times columnist David Brooks advised Romney that he will have to "do something aggressive" such as making Rick Perry look corrupt to remain formidable. Why is this editorialist from a Socialist/Marxist newspaper favoring Mitt Romney?

This is precisely why I don't care for liberals,David Brooks and their ilk.They more concerned with appearances and their "Acela Corridor dialect and to be seen as being genuinely helpful.He's the conservative when faced to choose between ultra-liberal Obama and ultra-moderate McCain, chose the former.Brooks is a trojan horse Conservative -a Conservative in name only.His Conservatism is a weapon against Conservatism.He's essentially a liberal Democrat, only the NY Times chooses to call him a Conservative.