Some of the major disadvantages and criticisms of Presidential form of government are as follows :
1) May fall prey to authoritarianism, unless it is applied on a single ethnic community it always runs a risk of vesting all the authority in the president which may lead to tyranny.
2) The separation of powers in the presidential form of governance indicates a limited level of accountability and the legislature and executive end up blaming each other.
3) Limited accountability, both for the president and the legislature.
4) It impedes any positive leadership change as it is entirely reliant on timely elections and cannot by any means dismiss an elected official before his time should the need arise.
However, the major advantage of a presidential form of government is that it ensures a united collective and is not impeded by the collective's indecisive natures. Authority vested in one hand leads to better stability and prevents greater strife. With time the system evolves enough to sate the dissenting voices by making them heard through the legislature and also indicates a limited interference by the executive and legislature in each other's affairs.
1) May fall prey to authoritarianism, unless it is applied on a single ethnic community it always runs a risk of vesting all the authority in the president which may lead to tyranny.
2) The separation of powers in the presidential form of governance indicates a limited level of accountability and the legislature and executive end up blaming each other.
3) Limited accountability, both for the president and the legislature.
4) It impedes any positive leadership change as it is entirely reliant on timely elections and cannot by any means dismiss an elected official before his time should the need arise.
However, the major advantage of a presidential form of government is that it ensures a united collective and is not impeded by the collective's indecisive natures. Authority vested in one hand leads to better stability and prevents greater strife. With time the system evolves enough to sate the dissenting voices by making them heard through the legislature and also indicates a limited interference by the executive and legislature in each other's affairs.